There is no doubt that my father was the chief influence Yehovah used for the direction of my life.
One nursery rhyme my father used to love to quote goes like this:
“There was a little girl who had a curl in the middle of her forehead.
When she was good she was very, very good, but when she was bad she was horrid.”
This is a pretty good description of my father. He had some extremely good character qualities, but he also had an incredible temper.
In many ways he was one of the best men I ever knew. One of his outstanding qualities was honesty. Not only did he want to be honest, but he did not want to appear to be dishonest to others. He would go out of his way to do extra things so that everyone knew he was being honest. He conveyed the importance of that truth very well to me.
This quality impressed me so much that he himself told me once that I was too honest. What he meant was that I tended to tell people things that were none of their business in order to be sure I never lied.
Another of his qualities he was his love of the Bible. He regularly read and studied it, and taught it in adult Sunday School class. The little Presbyterian church in which I grew up did not have a full-time pastor, but shared a pastor with a church in another neighborhood. As a result we had only Sunday School in the morning, and church at night. As a replacement for the morning church service my father would read the Bible and attempt to discuss it with our family around the table after the noon meal on Sunday.
It was not just his love for scripture that influenced me, but that he would discuss the scripture (or politics) with me. He would allow me to give my opinion, even though he might disagree, without repercussion. I could express almost any concept, and his response was generally to explain to my why he felt I was incorrect.
This was a great gift. This discussions with him has greatly honed my understanding for Elohim’s Word for which I am thankful. Not only that, but it motivated me to venture into areas of understanding that I might not have normally ventured into except for the great spiritual hunger the discussions created. Also, the affection I developed for my Dad through these discussions helped me to overcome the bitterness that developed in my siblings, because of my father’s angry discipline.
His anger was what made my father “horrid”. He would get angry and spank us beyond reasonable limits. Numerous times his spanking gave me large bruises on my behind. I’m sure it was the same with my brother and sisters.
Even worse than the anger with which he disciplined us was the fact that many times his anger was for trivial things. A few times I recalled being spanked undeservedly.
Although his spanking was extreme at times, I don’t ever recall him slapping or hitting me. His discipline was always with a belt or stick given on my behind.
One thing that he applied for psychological effect, I believe, is that he would chase us as if he were going to kick us in the behind to motivate us to move faster, but as I look back I do not ever recall him actually connecting the kick.
Because of his over-correction I believe my brother and sisters still seem to have anger and to have difficulty forgiving him. Though I have some struggle with this I believe having a forgiving spirit has been easier to me, because of the conversations we would have concerning the scripture.
My mother once asked me if I knew what happened to the old, heavy belt with which my Dad used to spank us.
I told her that I had realized at one point that he was no longer using the belt, but did not know what had happened to it.
She said, “I threw it away”.
The only answer I could give to that was, “God bless you!”
My father died of prostate cancer from which he might have been spared if he had not put off going to the doctor until he could wait no longer. Unfortunately by the time he got to the doctor the cancer had metastasized, and all the doctors could do was to try to keep him as comfortable as possible.
One advantage if you can use that word concerning dying of cancer over something fast like a heart attack was that the slow nature of my Dad’s death gave me the opportunity to sit and talk with him, kiss him on the cheek, and tell him that I loved him. That has helped me NOT to have regrets concerning my father.
It is not a wonder that the USA is in such dire straights. Just yesterday (Sep 4, 2012) God and Jerusalem as the capital of Israel were denied three times by the Democratic National Convention.
Not about my Bible or political comments. I’ll always be right about those.
What I need help with is my spelling and my English. If you see an error let me know.
The reason I need help is that English was the only foreign language I took in school.
One of the blind spots I have found among folks in the Messianic movement is that some like to talk in a technobabble. By the term “technobabble” I mean they talking in terms not understood by their uninitiated listeners. Often they speak this way to impress others, or because it sounds spiritually superior to them. Unfortunately they are accomplishing exactly the opposite effect. You do not prove that you are smarter or better than other people by talking “over their heads”.
Herb’s Rule of Being Understood:
Smart people understand their audience, and are able to speak to their audience so their audience understands.
There may actually be occasions where the person(s) listening won’t be able to understand. Several are:
- The listener does not have the mental capacity to understand, or just doesn’t care. In this case it is waste of time to try to explain. This is similar the seed by the wayside (Mark 4.4).
- The listener is too biased to “hear” what you are saying. This is a case that is worse than the first. At least you might be able to educate the ignorant. “Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? there is more hope of a fool than of him.” (Pro 26:12 KJV). This is similar to the seed that fell on the stony ground (Mark 4.5).
- The listener just doesn’ t have the time to consider the discussion. This is similar to the seed that fell among thorns (Mark 4.7).
If the person listening does not fall into one of these categories, and is nominally intelligent and “listens” to you you should be able to make yourself understood.
It is for this reason that I will be posting definitions in separate posts under the category of “Terminology”. These will be to assist anyone reading to understand what I am talking about, but also to enable me to be concise and not have to repeat the definition in each post. So if you find a word that you are not quite sure you understand look under the category of “Terminology”.
If you don’t find the term there or my definition is not adequate post a comment, and I will attempt to clear up my own “technobabble”.
Thank you for reading my blog. Let me hear from you.
One troubling contention that I have recently heard is that Yeshua (Jesus) never used His Father’s actual name, Yehovah (Jehovah; the Tetragrammaton). In my opinion it is an assertion that is impossible to establish, and most likely is not true for some good reasons.
The main reason why I find it troubling is that in order to say he never used His Father’s name you pretty much have to say that he followed the traditions of “the scribes and Pharisees” i.e. the rabbinical leaders of His time, however when you read the gospels you find Yeshua in continual contention with the Pharisees over their traditions. They were replacing the commandments of Elohim (God) with their traditions for which Yeshua always reproved them. Given His criticism of the leaders of the Jews, which ultimately led them to crucifying him, I believe it is ludicrous to say he followed this tradition. I will deal more thoroughly with the subject of Yeshua’s division with the Jewish leadership over their traditions in a future post.
The strongest argument I find that Yeshua actually used His Father’s name is that Matthew 23.37-39. Here in this verse he is mourning over the nation of Israel’s rejection of Him:
Mat 23:37-39 KJV
(37) O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
(38) Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
(39) For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord (Yehovah).
In verse 39 he is actually a quote from Psalm 118.26:
Psa 118:26 KJV
(26) Blessed be he that cometh in the name of the LORD (Yehovah): we have blessed you out of the house of the LORD (Yehovah).
Here are several things that I have observed concerning this quote that indicate he actually used the name of Yehovah.
1. Hebrew was most likely Yeshua’s native language:
The Brit Chadashah (New Testament) is written in Greek, but Yeshua’s language was almost certainly NOT Greek, but Hebrew and Aramaic. He would have certainly known and understood the language of the Tanakh. In Luke 4.17-18 when he was in his home synagogue we see him reading from the scroll of the prophet Isaiah in his home synagogue.
One corroboration from scripture to establish Hebrew as the main language of the Jews is an event that happened to the Apostle Paul. When he was being attacked by the crowds in the temple, and wanted to get the attention of those attacking him he spoke in Hebrew, which caused them to be silent and listen (Acts 22.1-2).
So when Yeshua taught and spoke of the scripture he was using the language of the scripture, Hebrew and Aramaic.
2. We know the actual name was used in the text of Psalm 118.26:
When we look into the text of the Psalm there is no doubt what word is used for the Father’s name; it is Yehovah (Yod-Hey-Vav-Hey). As a matter of fact the testimony of the whole of the Tanakh is to use The Name. It is used more than 6,000 times even in the Massoretic Hebrew text. If there is a problem with pronouncing the name of Yehovah then why is it recorded in His Word over and over.
3. If Yeshua did not use Elohim’s name he would be guilty of misquoting scripture:
If He did NOT use His Father’s name he would be guilty of misquoting the scripture by substituting a word not used in the in the text.
4. If Yeshua did not use Elohim’s name he could not fulfil all the commandments:
In order to be a perfect substitute for our sins He had to obey the Torah (Law) in every respect. Since we are commanded to call upon, swear by, and bless in the name of Yehovah he would have been disobeying these commandment NOT to use His Name, which would disqualify Him as the perfect sacrifice.
5. By using another word for the name of Elohim you may very well change the intended meaning of the verse:
If Yeshua quoted the verse as saying “Blessed is he that cometh in the name of ‘Adonai’ or ‘the LORD'”, you could infer that he was saying they would not see him again until they were ready to welcome him back again.
If Yeshua quoted the verse as saying, “Blessed is he that cometh in the name of Yehovah”, it conveys a much different meaning in the context of Yeshua’s relationship with the religious leaders. By actually using Elohim’s name he could be saying, “You won’t see me again until you abandon your man-made tradition of not saying Elohim’s name, and beginning to sanctify His name by actually blessing by the name of Yehovah”.
6. To assert that Yeshua did not know His Father’s name is ridiculous:
One of the main reason for substituting a title such as Adonai or The Lord for the name of Elohim is that we do not we do not know how to pronounce the name of Elohim, however it is totally ridiculous to say that Yeshua, Elohim’s only begotten son, did not know how to pronounce His own Father’s name.
One of the most important issues facing us, I believe, is abortion. If we believe that Elohim (God) is the creator and giver of life then, and believe that he has commanded us not to murder then we must be concerned with when life begins, because if life begins at conception then to terminate a pregnancy is murder.
When does life begin? I believe at conception. A fertilized egg has all the necessary ingredients to categorize it as a human being. A sperm does not; neither does an egg.
Of course the argument is always presented that a “fetus” (a term used in many cases just to sterilize the sin) must be viable outside the womb. I believe this point fails in this respect. If at conception the fertilized egg is left alone without an outside intervention it will normally and naturally come to term without any help from anyone. Something traumatic, something unnatural such as a sickness, malnourishment, or some other intervention must occur for the baby NOT to come to full term. On the other hand after a baby is born, unless there is intervention by someone to feed, cloth, clean, and comfort the baby, the baby will die. Therefore in terms of survival a fetus is just as or more viable than a newborn.
What is viability? I believe it is the ability for a life to continue in the environment in which it finds itself. The baby in the womb has everything he needs to live. He has food from his mother. He is surrounded by amniotic fluid for his comfort and safety. He actually breathes the amniotic fluid in and out of his lungs. This is his natural environment. He is not viable outside the womb, because that is not his proper environment.
Fish breath under water. If you take them out of the water they will die. Does that mean they are not viable? Of course not. They are fish not land animals.
Following his birth a human being breathes air. If you hold them under water for too long they will drown. Does that mean they are not viable. Of course not. They are not fish.
All life is viable in the environment for which they were designed by Elohim. An unborn baby is viable in his proper environment, the womb.
Please view the “180 Movie” on this subject at www.180movie.com. This is excellent.
Also share this link with all your friends.
The intricate detail of the work Elohim (God) weaves into our lives is a marvelous thing. He works the tapestry of our live by His Word through Ruach (Spirit) using the people and events he brings into our lives. There is no way, however, that any person can comprehend the work that he is doing from begining to end.
- (Ecc 3:11 CJB) He has made everything suited to its time; also, he has given human beings an awareness of eternity; but in such a way that they can’t fully comprehend, from beginning to end, the things God does.
I am aware that Elohim has used people and events He has brought into my life to influence and direct me in His Word and to a Messianic understanding. Some of these people and events have made a deep impression on me. They have influenced my understanding of salvation through Yeshua (Jesus) and His bringing me to the Torah for which I want to give Elohim the glory.
Of course I am sure that there are many people and events of which I am unaware or which I do not fully appreciate. I should probably be thankful to numerous people who deliberately contributed effort toward my spiritual growth that I haven’t even noticed. Expressing gratitude to others for their help in you life is a good thing, because it helps to keep you humble, and to know that the work was not yours but Elohim’s.
My purpose with this blog is to explain the ones that I understand so that you will understand how Elohim has moved me to be Messianic.